![]() ![]() The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". ![]() The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. He is the author of multiple New York Times bestsellers. But that will require him to bulldoze those who helped undermine that trust in the first place.īen Shapiro is a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School, host of “The Ben Shapiro Show” and editor-in-chief of. Musk may be just the man to help restore institutional trust to social media. This is why Musk’s first moves at Twitter must be to release information about the prior practices of Twitter - a sort of truth and reconciliation commission to make any new algorithms far more transparent and to fire employees who object to such practices, of whom there are many. After all, with transparency comes accountability. Better to ban The Babylon Bee for stating that Lia Thomas is a man than to allow such content to be passed around Twitter - and better never to let anyone know the algorithms behind such bans. To the Left, the potential “harm” of allowing free speech outweighs the value in open debate. The Left would prefer secret algorithms that conceal “shadow-banning” and bottlenecking the Left prefers “equity” in speech to freedom of speech. Then there’s the bigger problem: the Left despises both transparency and free speech in the political realm. That wouldn’t happen if they thought Twitter wasn’t their sole property. Now, upon Musk’s takeover, the Left has broken into spasms of apoplexy. For years, the Left claimed that conservative concerns about Twitter bias were simple paranoia. First, it shows that the Left always understood Twitter to be a key part of its ecosystem, a Left-biased platform designed to obscure its own leanings while propagandistically pushing a particular political agenda. The Left’s outsized panic over Musk’s takeover is revealing for two reasons. That was one of Musk’s concerns, presumably, in purchasing the service. That was the concern for tens of millions of us when social media decided to silence the Hunter Biden story, lock accounts of prominent Trump-associated officials who shared the story, and then finally to throw former President Donald Trump off of all services simultaneously following Jan. Elizabeth Warren called the deal “dangerous for our democracy.” MSNBC’s Ari Melber hilariously agonized, “You could secretly ban one party’s candidate, or all of its candidates, all of its nominees, or you could just secretly turn down the reach of their stuff and turn up the reach of something else and the rest of us might not even find out about it until after the elections.” Did the Chinese government just gain a bit of leverage over the town square?” Sen. The American Civil Liberties Union, while noting that Musk is a card-carrying member, fretted, “there’s a lot of danger having so much power in the hands of any one individual.” Meanwhile, powerful individual with consolidated power Jeff Bezos worried over the possibility of Chinese influence on Twitter: “Interesting question. Charles Blow of The New York Times vowed to leave the service in fact, #LeavingTwitter trended on the service. ![]() More transparency, not less.Īnd yet the political Left went utterly insane. I also want to make Twitter better than ever by enhancing the product with new features, making the algorithms open source to increase trust, defeating the spam bots, and authenticating all humans.”Īll of these seem like worthwhile and anodyne goals. Immediately upon the news of the buyout breaking, Musk tweeted, “Free speech is the bedrock of a functional democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated. The move was made, at least in part, for ideological reasons Musk has been vocally critical of Twitter’s management of information flow. This week, in one of the most shocking business moves in recent memory, Twitter reversed itself and decided to sell itself after all to Elon Musk, who paid some $44 billion for the privilege.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |